From 2636d1da868057c124d3b635a094a07955cddd86 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Adam Hyde <adam@coko.foundation>
Date: Wed, 2 Feb 2022 11:00:42 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Update RFPs.md

---
 src/articles/RFPs.md | 4 ++--
 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/articles/RFPs.md b/src/articles/RFPs.md
index 1764354..2c355c6 100644
--- a/src/articles/RFPs.md
+++ b/src/articles/RFPs.md
@@ -1,6 +1,6 @@
 ---
 title: "Can we do away with RFPs?"
-subtitle: ""
+subtitle: "Originally published on Upstream - https://upstream.force11.org/posts/can-we-do-away-with-rfps"
 author: Adam Hyde
 date: "2022-02-01"
 category: "thoughts"
@@ -64,4 +64,4 @@ That feedback was very interesting and inspired this post. It would be great to
 
 Assuming this stimulates discussion, then I will post more on this topic. I want to talk about avoiding pre-loaded assumptions in RFPs and how they can exclude good solutions and approaches from the very beginning.
 
-Copyright © 2022 Adam Hyde. Distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. The authors adhere to the Upstream Code of Conduct.
\ No newline at end of file
+Copyright © 2022 Adam Hyde. Distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 License. The authors adhere to the Upstream Code of Conduct.
-- 
GitLab