diff --git a/src/blog/posts/2023-08-21-kotahi-2-0-setting-a-new-standard-in-scholarly-platforms.md b/src/blog/posts/2023-08-21-kotahi-2-0-setting-a-new-standard-in-scholarly-platforms.md
index 2758dd9592fbbfec1806cc8b4f5e3fca8998a883..242d89fedb02c2e8bbda10ddeaf3a6498e9a37e5 100644
--- a/src/blog/posts/2023-08-21-kotahi-2-0-setting-a-new-standard-in-scholarly-platforms.md
+++ b/src/blog/posts/2023-08-21-kotahi-2-0-setting-a-new-standard-in-scholarly-platforms.md
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@ The peer review process is a crucial element of scholarly publishing. However, t
 
 In contrast, Kotahi provides flexibility to tailor the review process to each journal or review community's specific needs. Different models like open, blind, or double-blind reviews can be configured. Reviewers can collaborate on shared reviews or provide individual feedback.
 
-Kotahi enables customizing the level of author participation as well. Review workflows can allow authors to respond to reviewer comments via threaded discussions as required. The goal is facilitating constructive exchanges to improve the manuscript.
+Kotahi enables customizing the level of author participation as well. Review workflows can allow authors to respond to reviewer comments via threaded discussions as required. Annotations (threaded comments) directly on manuscripts is also supported. The goal is facilitating constructive exchanges to improve the manuscript.
 
 Whether the preference is for a relaxed open review or a strict double-blind process, Kotahi can accommodate it. Custom reviewer selection criteria, revision policies, feedback tools, and more can be incorporated.