micropublication issueshttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/groups/micropublication/-/issues2021-04-15T17:48:59Zhttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/253PDF export2021-04-15T17:48:59ZYannis BarlasPDF exportCopy-pasting @nickstiffler's description from !181 here.
> @yannis We couldn't wait on this any longer as we receive frequent requests for the PDF view. Let me know if you have any suggestions on how this should be implemented or if thi...Copy-pasting @nickstiffler's description from !181 here.
> @yannis We couldn't wait on this any longer as we receive frequent requests for the PDF view. Let me know if you have any suggestions on how this should be implemented or if this is ok for now. My plan it to export to PDF directly from the app using Puppeteer https://developers.google.com/web/tools/puppeteer, so this will be temporary.Upcomingnickstifflernickstifflerhttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/252Curators2021-04-15T17:42:27ZYannis BarlasCuratorsNew role: Curators
Curators will have pretty much the same interface as reviewers, but will be assigned instead of invited, like editors and SO's.New role: Curators
Curators will have pretty much the same interface as reviewers, but will be assigned instead of invited, like editors and SO's.Yannis BarlasYannis Barlashttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/251Section editors2020-05-06T17:04:19ZYannis BarlasSection editorsWe need a new role: Section editors.
SE's will have the same access rights as global editors, but only for manuscripts they've been assigned to.We need a new role: Section editors.
SE's will have the same access rights as global editors, but only for manuscripts they've been assigned to.Yannis BarlasYannis Barlashttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/241Remove science officer approval2021-05-05T20:34:57ZYannis BarlasRemove science officer approvalApproval will now happen through chat.
Hide the SO section in the editor panel.
Also make sure that "accept" decisions are not blocked by the lack of SO approval.Approval will now happen through chat.
Hide the SO section in the editor panel.
Also make sure that "accept" decisions are not blocked by the lack of SO approval.UpcomingYannis BarlasYannis Barlashttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/240Chat autosave2021-04-15T17:43:02ZYannis BarlasChat autosavenickstifflernickstifflerhttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/233Reinvite reviewer2020-01-24T14:46:49ZYannis BarlasReinvite reviewerWe need a button or something along those lines in the last version tab of the editor section that will:
* Assign a reviewer of an older version to this version
* Notify the reviewer via email that they need to check the changes
Once th...We need a button or something along those lines in the last version tab of the editor section that will:
* Assign a reviewer of an older version to this version
* Notify the reviewer via email that they need to check the changes
Once this button and chat with reviewers is implemented, we can hide the "Request Reviewer's attention" buttons.Yannis BarlasYannis Barlashttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/225Highlight differences between versions2020-04-01T14:45:28ZYannis BarlasHighlight differences between versionsThe diff should be between the current tab and the previous tab.The diff should be between the current tab and the previous tab.Yannis BarlasYannis Barlashttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/224Science Officer section2019-12-15T17:32:45ZYannis BarlasScience Officer sectionScience officers should only see the articles they were assigned to.
Make a separate "Science Officer Section" in the dashboard that is filtered accordingly.Science officers should only see the articles they were assigned to.
Make a separate "Science Officer Section" in the dashboard that is filtered accordingly.0.17.0Yannis BarlasYannis Barlashttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/220Lock version tabs2019-12-05T21:07:24ZYannis BarlasLock version tabsLock the version tabs in sync between the left and right hand panel of the split screen preview.
In other words, if you click on version one on the editor / reviewer panel, it should switch to version one of the preview automatically. ...Lock the version tabs in sync between the left and right hand panel of the split screen preview.
In other words, if you click on version one on the editor / reviewer panel, it should switch to version one of the preview automatically.
Probably worth introducing a toggle to unlock them as well.0.17.0Yannis BarlasYannis Barlashttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/198Cannot ping reviewer again2019-08-29T15:58:53ZYannis BarlasCannot ping reviewer again@draciti do you want to elaborate a bit on this?@draciti do you want to elaborate a bit on this?Yannis BarlasYannis Barlashttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/197Add email notification on revision submission2019-08-28T17:12:53ZYannis BarlasAdd email notification on revision submissionEmail should go to the assigned editor.Email should go to the assigned editor.Yannis BarlasYannis Barlashttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/196editorial comments not saved2019-11-20T17:25:57ZKaren Yookeditorial comments not savedhttp://micropublications.coko.foundation/article/144f2bcb-3d3b-46be-8257-7bfb058aff16
for this article i had submitted editorial comments via the decision letter. As an author, I received this message:
The editors have requested revis...http://micropublications.coko.foundation/article/144f2bcb-3d3b-46be-8257-7bfb058aff16
for this article i had submitted editorial comments via the decision letter. As an author, I received this message:
The editors have requested revisions for your article "Testing of author revision access and function for author and what the editor can see".
Decision letter:
the article needs you to test the revision function
View it on the microPublication platform.
As an editor, I no longer see my comments to the authors. Did we decide to throw out decisions, if so I think they are necessary to keep so we can make sure the authors addressed everything.0.16.0Yannis BarlasYannis Barlashttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/194Science officers should not be able to approve their own submissions2019-08-04T13:35:16ZYannis BarlasScience officers should not be able to approve their own submissionsThey should not be able to go through the editorial process generally.
They should be treated as "just an author" for the specific manuscript.They should not be able to go through the editorial process generally.
They should be treated as "just an author" for the specific manuscript.0.11.0Yannis BarlasYannis Barlashttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/193Hide decision section in the editor panel from science officers2019-08-05T19:35:11ZDaniela RacitiHide decision section in the editor panel from science officersHi Yannis,
The 'Send to Author' button in the 'Decision' dropdown is not working.
Can you test to see if you can replicate the error?
thxHi Yannis,
The 'Send to Author' button in the 'Decision' dropdown is not working.
Can you test to see if you can replicate the error?
thx0.11.0Yannis BarlasYannis Barlashttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/188Editors chat channel with author2020-02-10T14:58:26ZYannis BarlasEditors chat channel with authorWe need to add a chat component that will enable dialogue between the author and the
editors. We discussed how we should differentiate visually between chats so that the
wrong thing doesn’t end up in the wrong channel.We need to add a chat component that will enable dialogue between the author and the
editors. We discussed how we should differentiate visually between chats so that the
wrong thing doesn’t end up in the wrong channel.0.19.0Yannis BarlasYannis Barlashttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/187QC step2020-06-24T22:52:11ZYannis BarlasQC stepWe need a copyediting - curator QC step in the workflow, after the manuscript has been
accepted and before it goes into production.We need a copyediting - curator QC step in the workflow, after the manuscript has been
accepted and before it goes into production.Yannis BarlasYannis Barlashttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/186Reviewer open acknowledgement2019-09-16T18:12:22ZYannis BarlasReviewer open acknowledgementReviewers need a checkbox to indicate whether they want ‘open acknowledgement’ or
not.Reviewers need a checkbox to indicate whether they want ‘open acknowledgement’ or
not.0.13.0Yannis BarlasYannis Barlashttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/185Reviewer comments to the editor2020-12-01T11:13:09ZYannis BarlasReviewer comments to the editorReviewers need an extra text area to leave private comments to the editors.Reviewers need an extra text area to leave private comments to the editors.Yannis BarlasYannis Barlashttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/179Assign science officer2019-06-04T13:41:44ZYannis BarlasAssign science officerWe need the ability to explicitly assign a science officer to a manuscript, just like we do with editors.
Development should also take care of #147.We need the ability to explicitly assign a science officer to a manuscript, just like we do with editors.
Development should also take care of #147.0.9.0Yannis BarlasYannis Barlashttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/micropublication/micropublication/-/issues/177Re-open submission form to the author when revisions are needed2019-05-14T18:32:51ZYannis BarlasRe-open submission form to the author when revisions are neededThis is supposed to be a temporary solution, in the absence of proper versioning, which will come after the data model refactor.
Once the editors have made a revision decision, the following things will happen:
* The submission form wil...This is supposed to be a temporary solution, in the absence of proper versioning, which will come after the data model refactor.
Once the editors have made a revision decision, the following things will happen:
* The submission form will be editable by the author again in its entirety.
* The editors will not have access to the editor panel until the manuscript is re-submitted.
* The science officer approval status will be reset.
Some gotchas with this temporary solution:
* The science officer will need to approve the manuscript again.
* As we are not implementing proper versioning, we are essentially overwriting the decision of the same manuscript every time. Old decisions will not be available on each re-submission.
* Manuscripts under revision will not be visible to reviewers, even if they have been invited, until they are re-submitted.
* There can only be one review.0.8.0Yannis BarlasYannis Barlas