Kotahi issueshttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/kotahi/kotahi/-/issues2021-09-20T09:46:13Zhttps://gitlab.coko.foundation/kotahi/kotahi/-/issues/639Ability for administrators to restore deleted objects imported from bioRxiv/P...2021-09-20T09:46:13ZRyan Dix-PeekAbility for administrators to restore deleted objects imported from bioRxiv/PubmedNCRC v1https://gitlab.coko.foundation/kotahi/kotahi/-/issues/634[NCRC] Incomplete DOIs on import2022-05-22T14:03:22ZBen Whitmore[NCRC] Incomplete DOIs on importSome articles are imported without full DOIs, their DOI being recorded as "https://doi.org/"
These articles are still hyperlinked in the manuscripts page, but clicking the link takes you to the DOI homepage.
I suspect this comes about ...Some articles are imported without full DOIs, their DOI being recorded as "https://doi.org/"
These articles are still hyperlinked in the manuscripts page, but clicking the link takes you to the DOI homepage.
I suspect this comes about during pubmed import because `MedlineCitation.Article.ELocationID` could not be populated for some reason (see where [DOI is populated in code](https://gitlab.coko.foundation/kotahi/kotahi/blob/869832d8f12f0835576afc2ca26547e145506b54/server/import-articles/pubmed-import.js#L239-248)). Regardless of why this could not be populated, we should not create a bogus DOI like this, but rather leave the DOI blank (and the article un-hyperlinked in the Manuscripts page) if we don't have valid DOI information.
![image](/uploads/4a9b798df7ef5de9848d2ad6a6352ec7/image.png)NCRC v1https://gitlab.coko.foundation/kotahi/kotahi/-/issues/628[NCRC] Abstracts incorrect at import2023-08-22T01:52:32ZBen Whitmore[NCRC] Abstracts incorrect at importSome articles are being imported (via the "Refresh" button) with garbled abstracts. We expect the abstract to be a string of text, and for many articles this is what we get. But for a substantial minority, we instead get an array of stri...Some articles are being imported (via the "Refresh" button) with garbled abstracts. We expect the abstract to be a string of text, and for many articles this is what we get. But for a substantial minority, we instead get an array of strings. E.g.:
``` json
[
"Recent studies conclude that the global coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic decreased power sector CO",
" emissions globally and in the United States. In this paper, we analyze the statistical significance of CO",
" emissions reductions in the U.S. power sector from March through December 2020. We use Gaussian process (GP) regression to assess whether CO",
" emissions reductions would have occurred with reasonable probability in the absence of COVID-19 considering uncertainty due to factors unrelated to the pandemic and adjusting for weather, seasonality, and recent emissions trends. We find that monthly CO",
" emissions reductions are only statistically significant in April and May 2020 considering hypothesis tests at 5% significance levels. Separately, we consider the potential impact of COVID-19 on coal-fired power plant retirements through 2022. We find that only a small percentage of U.S. coal power plants are at risk of retirement due to a possible COVID-19-related sustained reduction in electricity demand and prices. We observe and anticipate a return to pre-COVID-19 CO",
" emissions in the U.S. power sector."
]
```
This comes from an article with the following abstract:
> Recent studies conclude that the global coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic decreased power sector CO<sub>2</sub> emissions globally and in the United States. In this paper, we analyze the statistical significance of CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reductions in the U.S. power sector from March through December 2020. We use Gaussian process (GP) regression to assess whether CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reductions would have occurred with reasonable probability in the absence of COVID-19 considering uncertainty due to factors unrelated to the pandemic and adjusting for weather, seasonality, and recent emissions trends. We find that monthly CO<sub>2</sub> emissions reductions are only statistically significant in April and May 2020 considering hypothesis tests at 5% significance levels. Separately, we consider the potential impact of COVID-19 on coal-fired power plant retirements through 2022. We find that only a small percentage of U.S. coal power plants are at risk of retirement due to a possible COVID-19-related sustained reduction in electricity demand and prices. We observe and anticipate a return to pre-COVID-19 CO<sub>2</sub> emissions in the U.S. power sector.
Here it's breaking at every subscript '2'. For other manuscripts I've looked at, it breaks when it encounters italic text. Evidently, internal tags such as \<i\> or \<sub\> are not being read correctly and breaking the import. I'm not sure whether these articles were imported from pubmed or biorxiv.
Aside from missing sections of text, the affected abstracts still display OK in the on-screen Wax editor. It is possible that some topics won't be detected, if the topic keyphrases are missing. Also, I don't know what the ramifications will be at time of export/publishing.NCRC v1https://gitlab.coko.foundation/kotahi/kotahi/-/issues/581[NCRC] text changes2021-07-28T09:42:51ZRyan Dix-Peek[NCRC] text changes**Description;** text changes that will be supported by the implementation of the Localisation task.
**Acceptance criteria;**
Dashboard;
- "Summary Info” à “Write this ESS”
- “Manuscripts I’m editor of” à “Articles Assigned to Me”
M...**Description;** text changes that will be supported by the implementation of the Localisation task.
**Acceptance criteria;**
Dashboard;
- "Summary Info” à “Write this ESS”
- “Manuscripts I’m editor of” à “Articles Assigned to Me”
Manuscripts;
- “Evaluation”à “Review ESS”
Research object;
- At top, change “Senior Editor” à “ESS Writer”
- At top, change “Handling Editor” à “First Reviewer”
- At top, change “Editor” à “Second Reviewer”
- Blue button at bottom when accessed through dashboard, change “submit your research object” to “Submit ESS to Reviewer”
- Blue tab, change “edit submission info” à “Edit ESS”
- Just below blue tab, “NCRC Submission Form” à “Expert Summary Sheet”NCRC v1https://gitlab.coko.foundation/kotahi/kotahi/-/issues/567Import article from SSRN2021-12-06T12:39:19ZRyan Dix-PeekImport article from SSRNhttps://www.ssrn.com/index.cfm/en/https://www.ssrn.com/index.cfm/en/NCRC v1https://gitlab.coko.foundation/kotahi/kotahi/-/issues/523[NCRC] Filtering by Manuscript Status on the Dashboard view2021-07-09T10:37:17ZRyan Dix-Peek[NCRC] Filtering by Manuscript Status on the Dashboard view**User story;** as an Editor I want to be able to filter by manuscript Status in order to easily locate articles that require an evaluation e.g. 'Uunsubmitted' articles.
**Acceptance criteria;**
- [ ] Ability for user to select a singl...**User story;** as an Editor I want to be able to filter by manuscript Status in order to easily locate articles that require an evaluation e.g. 'Uunsubmitted' articles.
**Acceptance criteria;**
- [ ] Ability for user to select a single filter option (Unsubmitted, Evaluated or Published) from a Status dropdown menu on the Dashboard page.
- [ ] Dropdown options also need to account for states used in default Kotahi instance (Aperture instance).
![Screenshot_2021-07-09_at_12.33.18](/uploads/5984fab9b898d73b2c4b648861db0ace/Screenshot_2021-07-09_at_12.33.18.png)NCRC v1