@@ -36,8 +36,8 @@ This example illustrates how the process can be viewed as a kind of human-machin
Finally, we need to consider customization. Each group of researchers has unique needs and preferences, and AI should be customizable to meet their needs. By allowing researchers to customize the AI tools they use, we can ensure that they are getting the most out of this technology. Our approach would be to offer an opt-in process or button at the set-up of a journal to ensure the journal’s team is interested in AI-assisted features. On top of that, we would also want to ensure all authors are asked whether they would like to have their manuscripts handled with AI-supported features.
## Where are go from here
## Where do we go from here?
Overall, integrating AI into Kotahi has the potential to greatly improve the efficiency and accuracy of the publishing process. However, we need to be thoughtful about how we implement this technology and be transparent about its contribution. By distinguishing between computer-assisted humans and generative AI, considering the role of manual input and allowing for customization, we can ensure that AI is integrated responsibly and effectively into the process.
With all this being said, we are all in. AI can and will greatly improve publishing, and Kotahi is set up to experiment with and implement AI seamlessly and responsibly. We are here to help you revolutionise scientific publishing with AI as a key component.
With all this being said, we are all in. AI can and will greatly improve publishing, and Kotahi is set up to experiment with and implement AI seamlessly and responsibly. We are here to help you revolutionise scientific publishing with AI as a key component.
