@@ -98,9 +98,9 @@ The peer review process is a crucial element of scholarly publishing. However, t
In contrast, Kotahi provides flexibility to tailor the review process to each journal or review community's specific needs. Different models like open, blind, or double-blind reviews can be configured. Reviewers can also collaborate on shared reviews while also providing individual feedback if desired.
Kotahi enables customizing the level of author participation as well. Review workflows can allow authors to respond to reviewer comments via threaded discussions if desired. Annotations (threaded comments) directly on manuscripts is also supported.
Kotahi enables customizing the level of author participation as well. Review workflows can allow authors to respond to reviewer comments via threaded discussions if desired. Annotations (threaded comments) directly on manuscripts is also supported.
Kotahi aims to facilitate constructive conversations between authors and reviewers to improve manuscripts. As peer review evolves towards more collaborative exchange, Kotahi provides built-in tools ready to enable
Kotahi aims to facilitate constructive conversations between authors and reviewers to improve manuscripts. As peer review evolves towards more collaborative exchange, Kotahi provides built-in tools ready to enable
this emerging review model.
By supporting tailored review workflows Kotahi ensures you can design the peer review model best suited for your needs. This flexibility and customizability result in higher quality, more meaningful reviews.
...
...
@@ -115,11 +115,13 @@ Users can quickly get answers, resolve issues, and streamline collaboration all
## Customizable Task Management
To streamline collaboration among users, Kotahi incorporates advanced but customizable task management capabilities. Project boards provide an overview of tasks and workflows across the publishing lifecycle.
To streamline worklow, Kotahi incorporates advanced but customizable task management capabilities. Project boards provide an overview of tasks and workflows across the publishing lifecycle.
Granular controls allow configuring task management at a per-journal or even per-manuscript level. Critical action items, revision requests, and production tasks can all be managed flexibly.
This results in workflows that are tailored to each manuscript's unique needs, while still providing the big picture view across journals.
Automated reminders, actions and invitations are configurable within the task manager itself.
This results in workflows that are tailored to each manuscript's unique needs.
