Update Kotahi_and_PRC.md

src/articles/Kotahi_and_PRC.md

@@ -23,25 +23,25 @@ These communities publish their reviews of preprints to assist other researchers
 
 To illustrate this approach simply, we can represent preprint review processes with the initials PR (Publish, Review):
 
-1.  Publish - researchers publish preprints on ‘preprint servers’
+1.  **Publish** - researchers publish preprints on ‘preprint servers’
 
-2.  Review - researchers review the preprints (and share the reviews)
+2.  **Review** - researchers review the preprints (and share the reviews)
 
 Traditional journal publishing, on the other hand, could be described with the initials RP (Review, Publish):
 
-1.  Review - researchers review a submitted manuscript
+1.  **Review** - researchers review a submitted manuscript
 
-2.  Publish - the manuscript is published
+2.  **Publish** - the manuscript is published
 
 This simple flip of the PR vs RP highlights the fundamental difference in approach. Preprint review processes flip the typical path of a manuscript through a journal on its head.
 
 PRC adds a new component to this dynamic: Curation.
 
-1.  Publish - researchers publish preprints on ‘preprint servers’
+1.  **Publish** - researchers publish preprints on ‘preprint servers’
 
-2.  Review - researchers review the preprints (and share the reviews)
+2.  **Review** - researchers review the preprints (and share the reviews)
 
-3.  Curate - a journal curates preprints from already published and reviewed sources. Michael Eisen et al formulate this as ‘Publication as curation.’ 
+3.  **Curate** - a journal curates preprints from already published and reviewed sources. Michael Eisen et al formulate this as ‘Publication as curation.’ 
 (https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.64910)
 
 []