... | ... | @@ -165,3 +165,59 @@ Tracked changes instead of granular permissions on the elements of the question/ |
|
|
16. Authors can only be paid $500 per year for submission (a way to get this e.g. report would be helpful) (Added for discussion).
|
|
|
* $10 per lo
|
|
|
* $50 per ho
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Week 4: Workflow steps review from week 1-3
|
|
|
|
|
|
[sign-up-steps-20200204.pdf](uploads/611b3c0d5a21845b992cc1629abb565f/sign-up-steps-20200204.pdf)
|
|
|
|
|
|
[submit-and-editor-review-question-20200204.pdf](uploads/e2f0fca0d21e56e2eeb722333ffa313f/submit-and-editor-review-question-20200204.pdf)
|
|
|
|
|
|
[resubmit-question-after-editor-review-20200204.pdf](uploads/89beb0771cb925dbc412a4e2f1fac99e/resubmit-question-after-editor-review-20200204.pdf)
|
|
|
|
|
|
[reviewer-review-question-20200204.pdf](uploads/6ea5f7d60b8d105413ab8b77afed331a/reviewer-review-question-20200204.pdf)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Week 5: Faculty and public use of published questions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Week 5 Agenda
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Use of published question by faculty.
|
|
|
2. Use of published question by the public.
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Use of published question by faculty**
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workflow steps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Community Member searches Question bank
|
|
|
2. Community Member see the question with its metadata, can optionally take the question before deciding to save to a list for export.
|
|
|
* SCORM compliant
|
|
|
* PDF of questions for use in the classroom as a handout
|
|
|
3. Community Member can Create, Rename, Update, Delete personal lists of questions
|
|
|
4. Community Member can export a list to a chosen file format or external system
|
|
|
|
|
|
Added steps for discussion (Not included in the proposal)
|
|
|
4. Community Member can edit an existing question and save the edited version.
|
|
|
can modify however they like.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Faculty/community members are signed up users with roles:
|
|
|
* Author (who can also be Reviewer, ME or HE)
|
|
|
* Production team (no use case for these users to create questions or lists)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relevant feedback from previous rounds:
|
|
|
|
|
|
The most common user will not be a reviewer or editor. We anticipate the general site users will save questions and lists and (possibly) author questions. We wonder if the “My Dashboard” page should be for this type of user. It would contain Authored Questions, Saved Questions, and Saved Lists all on one page. The second page could be called “Assignments” and it would include the Review and Edit tables. The Assignments page would only appear for users with the role “Reviewer” or “Editor."
|
|
|
|
|
|
**Use of published question by the public (non-logged in user)**
|
|
|
|
|
|
Workflow steps:
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. User searches Question Bank
|
|
|
2. User reads question(s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Added steps for discussion (Not included in the proposal)
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. We are ideally hoping that users will be able to "take" the question (select a response or enter text), then be shown the correct answer. If this is not within scope, our second choice would be to have the answer hidden and users can click a button to show the correct answer and why it is correct. For open-ended questions, since there will be no way to grade such an answer, show a rubric”
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. User exports individual questions
|
|
|
* Proposal states: “Questions exportable to learning management systems (SCORM compliant), Word documents, or other formats including CSV, Google docs, and QTIs.”
|
|
|
(Error in Google doc, this relates to logged in users.) |
|
|
\ No newline at end of file |