Tags give the ability to mark specific points in history as being important
  • S26_bis
    Release S26_bis

    Automatic reminders for pending reviewers (reminders at 4,7,14 days; removing invitation on day 21st)

    Bug fixes (HIN-1225, HIN-1251, HIN-1253)

  • S26
    Release S26

    Goal: Admin and EiC go different ways

    EiC role:
    • Hide draft manuscripts for EiC

    • As an EiC I shouldn’t be able to edit a manuscript.

    • As an EiC I shouldn’t be able to invite reviewers to a manuscript

    Admin role:
    • As an Admin I should be able to DELETE a manuscript at any stage (decision from the point of view of the admin)

    • As an Admin I should be able to edit a Manuscript Metadata (decision from the point of view of the admin)

    Improvements:
    • When HE asks for major revision, Reviewers who submitted a report are automatically invited, but shouldn't be automatically accepted

    • 'Country' field should allow the user to enter text to find the country easier than scrolling down

    • Background of the submit revision contextual box should be #FFF

    • 9 Bug fixes

    • Styleguide Documentation is up to date

  • S25
    Release S25
    Release notes:
    	• Improvements: 
    		• Reviewer sees reports from all reviewers after Author submits revision 
    		• Ability to revoke and assign another HE during the review process
    		• As a HE, I should be notified when a Admin/EiC removes me from a manuscript
    		• EiC - Request a Revision for a manuscript
    		• Send email to Author when EiC requests a Revision at submission
    		• As a reviewer, I should be notified when a Admin/EiC removes the HE from a manuscript
    		• As a author, I should be notified when a Admin/EiC removes the HE from my manuscript
    		• Send email to EiC when Author submits revision (requested by EiC)
    		• Password Strength
    		• "Needs attention" filter for Admin role should ignore manuscript drafts
    	• 9 Bug fixes (7 critical & major, 2 minor)
    	• Technical:
    		• Transition to Graph QL architecture: analysis and plan
    		• [pubsweeet] 'Country' field should allow user to enter text to find country easier than scrolling down
    		• Use custom icons instead of Feather library
  • S24
    Release S24

    Improvements:

    • Update the EQA package uploaded to MTS ftp, so that it contains info about reviewers and editors - started previous sprint, completed this sprint
    • Reviewer numbering
    • Reviewer sees reports from all reviewers after Author submits revision
    • Ability to revoke and assign another HE during the review process
    • 8 Bug fixes, 5 major - that were included in the release on Nov 19

    Pubsweet & Technical:

    • Transition to Graph QL architecture: analysis and plan
    • small progress on Documentation for styleguide components
    • [pubsweeet] 'Country' field should allow user to enter text to find country easier than scrolling down - wip
    • Use custom icons instead of Feather library - wip
  • S23
    Release S23

    Apply Visual Design:

    • HE, Author, Reviewers, EiC see new manuscript version and Response to Reviewer Comments after submitted revision (4 separate stories)

    Improvements:

    • Add "From Name" for every email in the system
    • Overwrite Delete Endpoint
    • As user, I want to see the label "You're viewing a previous version of the manuscript" instead of manuscript status
    • HE - make editorial recommendation options in different manuscript statuses
    • Redesign invite reviewer email template
    • Update the EQA package uploaded to MTS ftp, so that it contains info about reviewers and editors
    • Documentation for styleguide components

    Bugs fixed:

    • Reviewers shouldn't be able to write unlimited reviews on current version (API)
    • uploaded files are displayed in Author response to a Revision
    • Author can delete uploaded file in Response to Revision Request box (if he uploaded the wrong file)
    • Author shouldn't see the HE name on dashboard, in manuscript status 'HE Invited' (before HE accepted the assignment)
    • HE should be able to recommend to publish a manuscript after a Minor revision (even if no reviewer reports were sent on this manuscript version)
  • S22
    Release S22

    Submit revision flow

  • xpub-validators@0.0.3   xpub-validators@0.0.3
    ec46ae3c · Publish ·
  • xpub-upload@0.0.3   xpub-upload@0.0.3
    ec46ae3c · Publish ·
  • xpub-ui@0.0.3   xpub-ui@0.0.3
    ec46ae3c · Publish ·
  • xpub-theme@0.0.3   xpub-theme@0.0.3
    ec46ae3c · Publish ·
  • xpub-styleguide@0.0.3   xpub-styleguide@0.0.3
    ec46ae3c · Publish ·
  • xpub-selectors@0.0.3   xpub-selectors@0.0.3
    ec46ae3c · Publish ·
  • xpub-journal@0.0.3   xpub-journal@0.0.3
    ec46ae3c · Publish ·
  • xpub-edit@0.0.3   xpub-edit@0.0.3
    ec46ae3c · Publish ·
  • xpub-connect@0.0.3   xpub-connect@0.0.3
    ec46ae3c · Publish ·
  • xpub-collabra@0.0.2   xpub-collabra@0.0.2
    ec46ae3c · Publish ·
  • xpub-bootstrap@0.0.3   xpub-bootstrap@0.0.3
    ec46ae3c · Publish ·
  • pubsweet-component-xpub-submit@0.0.3   pubsweet-component-xpub-submit@0.0.3
    ec46ae3c · Publish ·
  • pubsweet-component-xpub-review@0.0.3   pubsweet-component-xpub-review@0.0.3
    ec46ae3c · Publish ·
  • pubsweet-component-xpub-manuscript@0.0.3   pubsweet-component-xpub-manuscript@0.0.3
    ec46ae3c · Publish ·